Bitcoin Core’s Broad Role Criticized by Industry Expert

Sjors Provoost criticized Bitcoin Core’s extensive scope at MIT Bitcoin Expo 2025.

The criticism emphasizes potential fragmentation risks, but institutional confidence in Bitcoin remains robust.

Sjors Provoost Challenges Bitcoin Core’s Broad Responsibilities

Sjors Provoost, a known Bitcoin Core contributor, expressed concerns about Bitcoin Core’s broad scope at the MIT Bitcoin Expo. He highlighted the complex integration of multiple elements, hinting at potential challenges.

Provoost’s comments revolve around Bitcoin Core being involved in wallet, consensus logic, and databases. He questioned the practicality of splitting these elements effectively.

Institutional Confidence Unshaken by Bitcoin Governance Debate

Institutional confidence in Bitcoin remains unaffected, despite criticism. This is reflected in strong ETF inflows, showing trust in Bitcoin’s overall architecture.

While the governance debate is concerning, it has yet to cause negative financial repercussions or alter major institutional investments in Bitcoin.

Past Debates Like SegWit, Taproot Offer Context

Past governance debates, such as SegWit and Taproot, increased scrutiny on Bitcoin’s development, sometimes leading to forks. Yet, investor confidence persists.

Historical trends suggest internal discussions may lead to changes, but robust data indicates confidence remains high, and no immediate fracture appears imminent.

“I do think it’s a problem now that Bitcoin Core is just too many things, like the wallet versus the consensus logic versus the databases and the RPCs and a bunch of other things… It sounds nice in theory, but if you think about how to actually split it and if that actually works, I’m not sure either…”