Bitcoin slides as Tom Lee flags April bear-market end

What to Know:

• Tom Lee projects crypto bear market ending by April, emphasizing cycle dynamics.
• Correct framing shapes views on liquidity, volatility, and risk amid sharp swings.

Market strategist Tom Lee said the crypto bear market may end by April at the latest, setting a clear time-bound thesis for digital assets. The statement centers on cycle dynamics and a prospective turn in sentiment rather than a specific price level.

The claim arrives after a period of sharp swings across major tokens, with investors debating whether recent drawdowns reflect a cyclical correction or a broader bear phase. Framing the decline correctly matters because it shapes how market participants interpret liquidity, volatility, and headline risk.

Why this matters for crypto now

A defined timeline can influence positioning, hedging, and liquidity provisioning across Bitcoin (BTC) and related equities. If sentiment inflects, the transition from risk-aversion to risk-normalization can compress spreads and reduce forced selling, though timing remains uncertain.

At the time of this writing, Coinbase Global (COIN) last traded near 163.95, down about 0.23% after-hours, according to Nasdaq real-time pricing. Equity proxies do not determine token prices, but they can reflect risk appetite for the broader crypto ecosystem.

Editorial context: Lee’s remark is directional guidance, not a guarantee, and depends on external catalysts aligning. “Crypto bear market may end by April at the latest,” said Tom Lee of FS Insight.

As a broader framework, Lee has recently discussed crypto’s four-year cycle dynamics alongside other industry leaders, emphasizing how cycles can compress or extend around macro shocks, according to the Ondo Conference. Cycle awareness can help distinguish a temporary drawdown from a regime change, but any inflection remains path-dependent.

Conditions tied to the April timeline claim

In mid-March 2025, Lee framed early April as a potential relief point tied to policy developments and sentiment reset, including the April 2 “Liberation Day” marker around tariff uncertainty, as reported by Wall Street Pit. He also conditioned a durable rebound on signs of monetary easing, such as clearer prospects for interest-rate cuts.

If those conditions slip or arrive unevenly, the timeline could extend and price action could remain choppy. Conversely, simultaneous improvement in trade-policy clarity and rate expectations could hasten stabilization, though the magnitude and duration of any rally would still depend on realized liquidity and market depth.