Coldcard maker Coinkite has moved to tighten the security of its hardware wallets following an exploit that drained roughly $130 million in Bitcoin from affected devices, one of the largest hardware-wallet incidents on record. The new Coldcard security measures target the firmware weakness at the center of the attack.
Coldcard maker Coinkite has moved to tighten the security of its hardware wallets following an exploit that drained roughly $130 million in Bitcoin from affected devices, one of the largest hardware-wallet incidents on record. The new Coldcard security measures target the firmware weakness at the center of the attack.
The changes follow what security researchers have described as the largest hardware-wallet exploit of the year, with roughly $116 million in Bitcoin moved out of compromised Coldcard wallets, according to blockchain analytics firm TRM Labs. For related coverage, see Trump Says US May Buy Sizable Amounts of Bitcoin.
Engineers at Block traced the root cause to a firmware flaw, describing a predictable random-number-generator fallback and a 32-bit reseed in Coldcard firmware. Because a hardware wallet derives its keys from randomness generated on the device, a predictable RNG can make the resulting seed guessable and the funds recoverable by an attacker.
Coinkite had earlier flagged related risk in a seed-generation warning for the Coldcard Mk3, advising users about how the device produces its master seed. The new measures are a direct response to heightened awareness of that attack surface.
WHAT TO KNOW
For holders, the practical takeaway is that any seed created under the flawed RNG behavior can no longer be assumed private. The wave of defensive activity is already visible on-chain, with billions in Bitcoin relocated to fresh wallets after the hack.
That migration also shows up in network usage, as new Bitcoin addresses jumped alongside the fund transfers. Coldcard owners weighing their exposure should verify their firmware version and, where affected, move funds to a newly generated seed rather than relying on the setup process that produced the vulnerability.
The incident is a reminder that self-custody shifts trust from an exchange to the correctness of a device’s cryptography, and that firmware, not just physical security, defines a wallet’s safety. The episode has become a self-custody wake-up call for Bitcoin holders reassessing how their keys were generated.
Post-exploit responses like this one can ripple across wallet providers, since a documented RNG failure in one product invites scrutiny of seed-generation practices industry-wide, an issue that has surfaced in other cases such as the BTCPay wallet exploit. What users and the market watch next will be the adoption rate of the patched firmware and whether more affected balances move before attackers can reach them.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
Quick access to the site tools and map-driven utility pages.
Follow the core desks readers use most across Bitcoin, altcoins, mining, events, and sponsored coverage.
© 2026 BitcoinInfoNews.com. All rights reserved.
Independent Bitcoin and crypto coverage with public trust, policy, and newsroom pages available sitewide.
