MARA transferred 6,000 BTC to Two Prime, according to on-chain tracking, while wallets linked to Strategy also moved funds around the same time, drawing attention to how large Bitcoin treasury holders route their coins between counterparties.
MARA transferred 6,000 BTC to Two Prime, according to on-chain tracking, while wallets linked to Strategy also moved funds around the same time, drawing attention to how large Bitcoin treasury holders route their coins between counterparties.
MARA transferred 6,000 BTC to Two Prime, according to on-chain tracking, while wallets linked to Strategy also moved funds around the same time, drawing attention to how large Bitcoin treasury holders route their coins between counterparties.
The transfer sent 6,000 BTC from MARA to Two Prime, as flagged by on-chain tracker Lookonchain. Two Prime is the counterparty on the receiving end of the movement. For related coverage, see A 2021 Coldcard Firmware Flaw Is Still Draining Bitcoin Wallets.
A wallet-to-counterparty transfer is not the same as a confirmed sale. On-chain data shows coins changing hands between addresses, but it does not by itself establish that MARA disposed of the Bitcoin or realized any position. For related coverage, see Coldcard Urges Users to Move Bitcoin as Exploit Continues.
The relationship between the two firms is established. MARA led a $20 million investment in Two Prime to advance institutional Bitcoin yield strategies, and the company has previously deployed BTC into a yield strategy with Two Prime. That context frames the transfer as consistent with an existing arrangement rather than a standalone event.
Separately, wallets linked to Strategy also moved funds around the same window, per on-chain reporting. Both MARA and Strategy sit among the most-watched Bitcoin treasury-related entities, which is why observers place their flows side by side. For related coverage, see BitGo to Migrate $7.4 Billion in Wrapped Bitcoin From LayerZero to Chainlink CCIP.
These are parallel developments, not proven coordination. The article is comparing timing and relevance because both moves involve prominent treasury holders, not asserting that the two entities acted together or for the same reason.
The overlap can influence how the market reads the activity, since MARA and Strategy have both featured in institutional Bitcoin disclosures, including first-quarter filings that listed Coinbase, Strategy, and MARA share positions. That shared prominence is the connection, not any evidence of a joint strategy.
Large holders move BTC between wallets and counterparties for reasons that include custody changes, financing arrangements, or trading and yield activity. A transfer into a counterparty like Two Prime can reflect any of these without implying a sale.
On-chain movement alone does not prove a disposal decision. Movement between addresses is visible, but the intent behind it, whether collateral, yield deployment, or rebalancing, is not something the ledger reveals.
Accumulation and distribution patterns among sizable wallets are tracked closely for the same reason, as seen when mid-sized Bitcoin wallets added 19,610 BTC over a recent stretch. For MARA and the Strategy-linked flows, the verifiable facts remain the transfer itself and the parallel wallet activity, with intent still unconfirmed.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
Quick access to the site tools and map-driven utility pages.
Follow the core desks readers use most across Bitcoin, altcoins, mining, events, and sponsored coverage.
© 2026 BitcoinInfoNews.com. All rights reserved.
Independent Bitcoin and crypto coverage with public trust, policy, and newsroom pages available sitewide.