Truth Social’s three crypto ETF filings were pulled from SEC review, raising questions about timing, process and what the withdrawn applications mean for investors.
Truth Social’s three crypto ETF filings were pulled from SEC review, raising questions about timing, process and what the withdrawn applications mean for investors.
Three crypto ETF filings connected to Truth Social have been pulled from SEC review, removing the proposals from the active regulatory pipeline that investors and ETF watchers had been monitoring closely.
Three separate proposed crypto ETF filings tied to Truth Social were removed from the SEC’s active review process. The filings, which had been submitted as self-regulatory organization rulemaking proposals, no longer appear among active filings on the SEC’s national securities exchange rulemaking page.
A pulled filing is not the same as a formal rejection or an approval. It means the SEC review process is no longer active for those specific applications.
The three filings each corresponded to distinct registration entities, as reflected in separate SEC submission records tied to different CIK numbers. The withdrawal follows an earlier instance in which Truth Social withdrew a Bitcoin ETF application from the SEC, suggesting a pattern of filing and pulling proposals from the regulatory process.
SEC review status is one of the most closely watched signals for market participants tracking crypto ETF progress. Each milestone in the review timeline, from initial filing to comment periods to final decisions, shapes expectations around product launch dates and investor confidence.
The difference between a delayed review and a withdrawn filing is significant. A delay keeps the application in the queue, while a withdrawal removes it entirely. For traders and institutional investors monitoring the crypto ETF landscape, the removal of all three filings at once changes the calculus around Truth Social’s crypto ambitions.
The move also lands amid broader regulatory scrutiny of crypto-linked financial products. As the SEC continues to evaluate proposals from multiple issuers, withdrawals like this can shift sentiment around which products are likely to reach the market. Developments such as the recent executive review of crypto firms’ access to payment rails underscore how fluid the regulatory environment remains for newer entrants.
Pulled filings typically leave the door open for refiling. The issuer can revise the proposal, address any concerns raised during the review process, and resubmit at a later date. Nothing in the withdrawal process prevents a future application.
Whether the move signals a temporary reset or a longer pause in strategy remains unclear. No public statement has accompanied the withdrawal, and the SEC filings themselves do not indicate a reason for the removal.
The crypto ETF space continues to evolve rapidly, with projects across the industry exploring new product structures. Efforts like the Ripple and XRPL Foundation partnership on quantum security illustrate how the broader digital asset ecosystem is maturing even as individual filings face setbacks.
Investors tracking this story should monitor the SEC’s self-regulatory organization rulemaking page for any new filings under the same CIK numbers. A refiling would appear there, as would any amended proposals. For now, Truth Social’s three crypto ETF plans are off the SEC’s active docket.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
Quick access to the site tools and map-driven utility pages.
Follow the core desks readers use most across Bitcoin, altcoins, mining, events, and sponsored coverage.
© 2026 BitcoinInfoNews.com. All rights reserved.
Independent Bitcoin and crypto coverage with public trust, policy, and newsroom pages available sitewide.