Boltz confirmed the decision through its official account on X, stating that the non-custodial Bitcoin bridge had been taken down, in a post from the Boltz team . For related coverage, see Boltz Disables Bitcoin Swaps: What It Means for Users .
Boltz confirmed the decision through its official account on X, stating that the non-custodial Bitcoin bridge had been taken down, in a post from the Boltz team . For related coverage, see Boltz Disables Bitcoin Swaps: What It Means for Users .
Boltz has shut down its non-custodial Bitcoin bridge following a wave of AI-assisted attacks, pulling one of the exchange’s key pieces of Bitcoin infrastructure offline as a security precaution.
Boltz confirmed the decision through its official account on X, stating that the non-custodial Bitcoin bridge had been taken down, in a post from the Boltz team. For related coverage, see Boltz Disables Bitcoin Swaps: What It Means for Users.
The move was tied directly to attacks that were being aided by artificial intelligence, according to reporting that Boltz shut the service after AI began finding bugs too fast for the team to keep pace. For related coverage, see Citi Disclosed Buying Bitcoin: What It Means for BTC.
The shutdown is being presented by Boltz as a direct response to security pressure, rather than a routine maintenance pause. The company framed the AI-assisted attacks as the decisive factor behind pulling the bridge. For related coverage, see Hashdex to Liquidate DEFI Bitcoin ETF This Month, Selling About 225 BTC.
Boltz has not published a detailed breakdown of the attack methods, any losses, or a timeline for restoring the service, and none of those details are established in the available record. The core claim is that automated tooling was surfacing vulnerabilities at a rate that made continued operation untenable.
This is not the first disruption to Boltz’s Bitcoin products. The exchange had earlier disabled Bitcoin swaps for its users, and the bridge shutdown extends that defensive posture.
Because the bridge was non-custodial, users retained control of their funds rather than trusting Boltz to hold them. The practical impact is loss of access to the routing service the bridge provided, not a custodial breach of user balances.
The gap has already drawn competing infrastructure into the space, with Blockstream launching a swaps beta while Boltz stays offline. That signals demand for non-custodial Bitcoin routing has not disappeared with the shutdown.
More broadly, the episode adds to a run of security stress on Bitcoin-adjacent services, following incidents such as the fallout after the Coldcard hack that pushed billions in Bitcoin to safety. If AI-assisted vulnerability discovery is now outpacing small teams, non-custodial operators face a rising defensive burden.
Boltz has not given a public date for restoring the bridge. Users should watch the exchange’s official channels for any confirmed timeline before assuming the service is available again.
Additional source references: source document 1.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
Quick access to the site tools and map-driven utility pages.
Follow the core desks readers use most across Bitcoin, altcoins, mining, events, and sponsored coverage.
© 2026 BitcoinInfoNews.com. All rights reserved.
Independent Bitcoin and crypto coverage with public trust, policy, and newsroom pages available sitewide.