Forwarding, or relay, policy governs which transactions a node chooses to pass along to its peers. It is a local decision each node makes, separate from whether a transaction is ultimately valid.
Forwarding, or relay, policy governs which transactions a node chooses to pass along to its peers. It is a local decision each node makes, separate from whether a transaction is ultimately valid.
DOG mode relaxes Bitcoin’s transaction forwarding policy, changing how nodes choose to relay certain transactions across the network while leaving Bitcoin’s consensus rules entirely untouched. The distinction between what nodes forward and what they consider valid is the whole story here.
Forwarding, or relay, policy governs which transactions a node chooses to pass along to its peers. It is a local decision each node makes, separate from whether a transaction is ultimately valid. For related coverage, see Spot Bitcoin ETFs See $132M Inflows, Ether ETFs Add $36.73M.
DOG mode relaxes that policy, meaning affected nodes are willing to propagate a broader set of transactions than they otherwise would, according to reporting on the change. The adjustment operates at the propagation layer rather than the validation layer. For related coverage, see Strive Added 18 Bitcoin Last Week, Treasury Reaches 19,900 BTC.
Because this is an operational setting, it does not rewrite how Bitcoin defines a valid transaction. It only affects how easily certain transactions spread between nodes, a behavior configured in Bitcoin Core software rather than in the protocol’s base rules, as documented in the client’s release materials. For related coverage, see SEC Approves Higher IBIT Options Limits as Bitcoin ETF Demand Grows.
Consensus rules determine what blocks and transactions the network accepts as valid. Relay policy, by contrast, only guides what individual nodes choose to forward before a transaction is ever mined. For related coverage, see BitMine Reports $73M Ethereum Treasury Purchase.
That is why DOG mode does not alter Bitcoin’s base validation. A transaction that was invalid under consensus before the change remains invalid after it; only the willingness of nodes to relay valid-but-otherwise-filtered transactions shifts.
The separation matters for how such updates are described. A policy adjustment is not a soft fork or a hard fork, and framing it as a change to Bitcoin’s rules would misstate what has actually happened at the protocol level.
For node operators, a relaxed forwarding policy can change which transactions move more freely through the mempool and reach miners. The practical effect is on network experience rather than on the security assumptions that consensus provides.
That nuance is easy to lose in market commentary, where any Bitcoin software change can be recast as a fundamental shift. It is the same interpretive gap that surrounds louder market calls, such as when critics like Peter Schiff issue sweeping predictions about Bitcoin that outrun the underlying facts.
Because DOG mode leaves consensus intact, it does not change the base guarantees that underpin activity like the sustained institutional demand reflected in spot Bitcoin ETF inflows. The update is best read as a relay-policy tweak, not a consensus overhaul.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
Quick access to the site tools and map-driven utility pages.
Follow the core desks readers use most across Bitcoin, altcoins, mining, events, and sponsored coverage.
© 2026 BitcoinInfoNews.com. All rights reserved.
Independent Bitcoin and crypto coverage with public trust, policy, and newsroom pages available sitewide.